For the past week I have found myself reading the news on my phone wondering how in the world [insert crazy-thing-that-seems-in-gross-violation-of-the-consitution here] is allowed to happen.
All these actions are intended to be overwhelming. This is their plan, to wear us down, burn us out, and lower our defenses. It’s a war of attrition. Flood with so many policies that even if ten are stopped, three will get by.
But get by WHOM? I kept coming back to the same question over and over again: Who is going to stand up these people?
I learned two answers to this question.
The Most Formidable Trump/Musk Opponents
At the moment, it’s federal employees.
The Office of Personnel Management sent out an email last week entitled “Fork in the Road,” in which every federal employee was offered their salary until September 30th in exchange for their resignation. It’s an offer to buy off federal employees, and the offer specified that if they took it, they could work remotely until they resigned. That was the exact same email subject that Musk sent to Twitter employees when he bought the company, the vast majority of whom were laid off.
It’d be easy to read it and think that Musk will X-ify the federal government.
My first piece of solace in all this was not only that every federal employee union encouraged their members to reject the offer, but that many federal employees view it with complete disgust.
For example: so many employees reported the email as a phishing attempt that the Office of Personnel Management had to send out a follow up email saying that it was not phishing. Which many employees also reported as phishing.
The r/fednews subreddit has become a safe place to discuss and deride the offer, as well as discuss and report disturbing Trump/Musk activity in their departments and alert the media.
Their rallying cry has been “Hold the Line! Don’t Resign!”
But in true gallows humor, their *other* rallying cry has been Come and Take It, with an Office Space twist.
I pored over r/fednews and have talked to a dozen federal employees. I heard over and over again: “I swore an oath of loyalty to the constitution.”
Their defiance crystalized for me that Trump/Musk have played their hand. For all their bluster of firing federal employees, a 7-month buy out offer is an admission that they have limited ability to do so. Trump is actively trying to reneg on federal union bargaining agreements that were enacted in the month before he took office, itself an admission that he can’t get around them. They have the power of law.
The focus on federal employees is telling too. Bureaucrats that follow the rules and put loyalty to the constitution above all else are truly formidable opponents. If you don’t believe in the constitution, if you don’t care about it, and you just want to do whatever you want to whatever part of federal government and answer to nobody—federal civil servants are in your way. Trying to buy them off is a gamble that shows just how much you can’t get around them.
Just look at this rundown of actions from the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), which is one of the largest labor unions among federal workers. They filed a lawsuit against the Department of Government Efficiency the day after Trump was sworn in, pointing out that it violates the Federal Advisory Committee Act. These motherFACAs!
It was the answer to my question; this is who is going to stand up. And what makes them uniquely effective is that they aren’t standing up for themselves, or their politics, or because they don’t like Trump. They stand for the constitution.
They won’t win every fight. But they are fighting.
[[SIDEBAR: A quick note on the deal. Whatever number of federal employees takes the buy out offer, Trump/Musk will call a win. Don’t believe it. People leave jobs all the time, people retire all the time, and the federal government is no exception. In an average year, about 6% of all federal employees will leave, around 120,000 people. A high year is over 7%, a low year is 5%. So, if you assume that everyone who was going to leave this year already takes the buy out, then 6% will take it. Anything less, and the buy out offer is encouraging federal workers to stay. ]]
The Most Formidable Trump/Musk Enablers
Are Republicans.
Trump and Musk are ginning up the outrage machine. They are barraging us with truly despicable actions. Wired is reporting the Musk lieutenants, who are taking over federal agencies, are possibly unpaid, definitely inexperienced, and likely not vetted and background checked. I give it a year before it’s revealed that one of them has previously undisclosed connections to Russia. And yet, there they are, rooting around in payment systems held in trust at the U.S. Treasury—a bank account holding your tax dollars as deposits—and they get to do this because Musk hand chose them.
If you’re angry, be angry, but stay focused. Musk and his crew aren’t breaking-and-entering, they didn’t get inside via a series of daring ploys in a Mission Impossible-type action sequence. And everything they are doing can be stopped in minutes.
The House and Senate have oversight authority over the federal government. Everything that is happening right now is going on with their blessing. This is the actual Mission Impossible (or Scooby Doo?) moment, when the mask comes off and the villain reveals himself. Take off Musk’s mask, and you’ll find dozens of Republican members of Congress who have enshrined an unelected private citizen to wield more power than any of them.
Specifically, the Republican members of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs:
Rand Paul, Kentucky, Chair
Ron Johnson, Wisconsin
James Lankford, Oklahoma
Rick Scott, Florida
Josh Hawley, Missouri
Bernie Moreno, Ohio
Joni Ernst, Iowa
Ashley Moody, Florida
And the Republican members of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform:
James Comer, Kentucky, Chair
Jim Jordan, Ohio
Mike Turner, Ohio
Paul Gosar, Arizona
Virginia Foxx, North Carolina
Glenn Grothman, Wisconsin
Michael Cloud, Texas
Gary Palmer, Alabama
Clay Higgins, Louisiana
Pete Sessions, Texas
Andy Biggs, Arizona
Nancy Mace, South Carolina
Pat Fallon, Texas
Byron Donalds, Florida
Scott Perry, Pennsylvania
William Timmons, South Carolina
Tim Burchett, Tennessee
Marjorie Taylor Greene, Georgia
Lauren Boebert, Colorado
Anna Paulina Luna, Florida
Nick Langworthy, New York
Eric Burlison, Missouri
Eli Crane, Arizona
Brian Jack, Georgia
John McGuire, Virginia
Brandon Gill, Texas
These are the people that deserve your ire and there are a lot more paths to accountability over them than there are over Musk. Congress controls spending. Congress controls the design of the federal government. Congress sets procedures for civil service hiring. Congress has subpoena power. The overreach of executive (in the case of Trump) or private individual (in the case of Musk) power cannot happen if Congress claims its own power.
Musk, and to a certain extent Trump, are the sideshow. So let’s assess Republicans.
Elected members of the party fall into one of two camps: 1) they love Trump/Musk and support whatever they want to do, or 2) they don’t agree or approve, but are scared into silence.
Musk has more power than Trump in this case, because he uses his social media platform to target Republicans who disagree with him. For example, Indiana Senator Todd Young questioned Tulsi Gabbard, the nominee for Director of National Intelligence, about her past praise for Edward Snowden. Musk trashed him on twitter as part of the deep state. Young calls him. Voila! Musk announces that *actually* Young is great and they are aligned on DOGE.
It’s not an empty threat to target Republican senators on social media, because they are vulnerable to a far-right challenge in their primaries. The AP has a story detailing each of the senators that are most vocal against Trump/Musk and their nominees, and therefore most at risk. Disapproving Republicans have been effectively neutralized.
At least for the moment.
Unlike Musk, Republicans have constituents. Not the vitriolic mass that lives on X, but actual constituents from their district that want economic security and a better life for their families. Constituents who may be upset to learn that a 19-old college dropout who had an internship at a Musk company is rifling around their Social Security checks.
Cards on the table
With all the power they can grab, with impotent oversight in Congress, Trump/Musk have played their hand: power and retribution come first, attention and bluster come second, and the economic needs of American workers and families don’t even qualify as a distant third.
P.S. Extra Credit
Here are the Democratic members of the oversight committees. See your rep, give them a call.
Senate:
Gary Peters, Michigan, Ranking Member
Maggie Hassan, New Hampshire
Richard Blumenthal, Connecticut
John Fetterman, Pennsylvania
Andy Kim, New Jersey
Ruben Gallego, Arizona
Elissa Slotkin, Michigan
House:
Gerry Connolly, Virginia, Ranking Member
Eleanor Holmes Norton, District of Columbia
Stephen Lynch, Massachusetts
Raja Krishnamoorthi, Illinois
Ro Khanna, California
Kweisi Mfume, Maryland
Shontel Brown, Ohio
Melanie Stansbury, New Mexico
Robert Garcia, California
Maxwell Frost, Florida
Summer Lee, Pennsylvania
Greg Casar, Texas
Jasmine Crockett, Texas
Emily Randall, Washington
Suhas Subramanyam, Virginia
Yassamin Ansari, Arizona
Wesley Bell, Missouri
Lateefah Simon, California
Dave Min, California
Ayanna Pressley, Massachusetts
Rashida Tlaib, Michigan
Can I nominate you for Queen of the Resistance? I’ve read everything in sight on Elon’s illegal takeover but this is the one of the best takes so far. Calling all my reps but will add attention to the Oversight Committee.
Meanwhile, some of us are already looking at losing everything. With the dismantling of SBA programs, like 8A and small business designated contracts, my wife’s business could be lost within the week. She employs 140 people across the country and manages millions of dollars in government funding to prevent pollution, protect wildlife, and even return the bodies of stolen Indian children to their tribes after they died in orphanages. This is about a small number of people gaining wealth.